In September, 2011 the Massachusetts
enacted into Law the Alimony Reform Act of 2011. This law changed
completely the law of alimony in the state. It created presumptive
maximum lengths of time for alimony to be received, guidelines to
determine the amount of alimony, four categories of alimony and other
changes. Attorneys generally advise that there are many areas of
this new law that are difficult to interpret without appellate court
decisions. We now have the benefit of the first case to interpret
the new law.
In the case of Holmes v. Holmes,
SJC-11538
(April 2, 2014) the court addressed the question of when does general
alimony start for purposes of the presumptive maximum length of time.
The question may be restated as does temporary alimony count towards
the maximum length of time for receiving general alimony. The
court's answer was that temporary alimony does not count towards
general alimony.
In the Holmes case, the wife had
received temporary alimony for over two years during the pendency of
the divorce. Since the couple had been married for under twenty
years, the court set a termination date for alimony payments. This
date did not take into account the money paid as temporary alimony
during the divorce. The court did state that if the recipient of
alimony had delayed the divorce then the court should consider a
portion of the pre-judgment period towards the presumptive maximum
limit. However, the two years of temporary alimony in the Holmes
case did not seem so long that the Judge should consider a different
outcome.
The Alimony Reform Act of 2011 changed
alimony from a law that favored women to a law that favored men. The
recent decision of the Supreme Judicial Court is a small step
swinging the law back towards women. Alimony in Massachusetts
remains a complicated subject. Anybody getting divorced in
Massachusetts with questions about alimony should consult an
experienced divorce attorney to understand their rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment