A number of courts have examined specific communications in which emojis were used. These cases addressed the issue of what, if any, legal effect is to be given to the communication which used emojis. In a Massachusetts case the District Attorney argued that an emoji with eyes crossed sent by the defendant to the victim was evidence of premeditated murder. The court allowed the jury to consider the emoji as evidence. A Colorado Court discussed the difficulty of interpreting emojis as it is a picture used to convey information. The Court noted that interpretation is more difficult as the actual image created by the emoji can differ depending on the software used by each person. An Israeli Court concluded that a contract had been created after considering a communication that used emojis.![Squirrel Emoji [Free Download IOS Emojis] | Emoji Island](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1061/1924/products/Squirrel_Iphone_Emoji_JPG_1024x1024.png?v=1571606115)
Courts have interpreted emojis in criminal cases, contract cases, family law cases, sexual harassment cases, copyright cases, and a variety of other cases. Court will continue to interpret emojis as long as people use them for communication.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete